44

COMMENTS

PRINT

TEXT SIZE:

A A A
A pair of New Yorkers living in a 175-square-foot studio might just be the wave of the future.

Zaarath and Christopher Prokop don't cook in their own kitchen. They "store" most of their clothes at dry cleaners. A cappuccino machine is their only kitchen appliance, and a cat-gym and a queen-sized bed are almost the only furniture. But the Prokops (shown left) say that they're happy with their home, which cost them $150,000 a few months ago. With two full-time jobs, they'll have paid off the mortgage in just two years, according to the New York Post.

The Prokop's lifestyle is not for everyone - it wouldn't work without nearby dry cleaners and restaurants. But with a little design help, tiny homes like the Prokop's -- or the wee Japanese single-family home pictured below --- could fill a big gap in the housing market, particularly for students and singles in expensive cities.

To get a sense of the problem, consider that the population of New York is projected to grow by another million or so people over the next couple of decades. Where will they fit? Will poor New Yorkers get priced out? Even after the real estate crash pummeled prices, the average person living in New York City still can't afford an average home.

Architects from all over the world found answers at a September symposium held in Manhattan by the Citizen's Housing Planning Council. They showed photos and floor plans of tiny homes - all full of light, fresh air, and clever built-ins. Because they are designed to be tiny -- as opposed to improvised slice-ups of existing buildings -- all the homes find room to hang a few suits and necessities. And they are much brighter than the Prokop's redeveloped Manhattan maid's room.

Check out the presentations: About four minutes into architect Azby Brown's talk, you'll see the 426-square-foot home of a 19th-century Japanese samurai, followed by modern Japanese single-family homes squeezed onto lots as small as a parking space (once the video loads up, you can fast forward). Other architects present San Diego apartments with shared kitchens, Italian apartments with shared gardens, and the Canadian Grow-Home, a compact townhouse. Finally, you'll hear a New York City code official try to address the archaic and sometimes foolish rules that keep our tiny homes from looking this good. Still, as these architects have shown, less can sometimes be more.
Add Your Comment

Tags: architecture, Housing Watch, HousingWatch, Japan, New York, NewYork, tiny homes, TinyHomes

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)

1. imiwati on Thursday, Dec 10th at 11:38:AM said...

hello there

2. Scot on Sunday, Dec 20th at 02:45:PM said...

hello?

3. Larry Petersen on Sunday, Dec 13th at 03:11:PM said...

This is the wave of our future!With a large FED TAX.

4. Larry Petersen on Sunday, Dec 13th at 03:15:PM said...

this a wave of the future,with a FED TAX

5. ThinkUp70 on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 12:15:PM said...

They must have a few bolts missing to pay $150,000 for 175 feet of living space.

There must be some small houses outside the area that need repair, for that kind of money.

6. mary ann on Monday, Jan 18th at 04:56:PM said...

Have you ever been to New York City?

7. MAL LUC VAAN HORNE on Wednesday, Jan 20th at 09:30:PM said...

YES, THERE ARE HOUSE IN THAT PRICE RANGE--WITHIN A TWO HOUR COMMUTE TO AND THEN FROM THE CITY. THE PRICE PER SQUARE FOOT ISNT BAD FOR NYC. I AM HAPPY TO SEE THAT YOU PUT YOUR CONCERNS IN AN ASCERBIC AND SOMEWHAT CAUSTIC TONE THOUGH--IT SHOWS THE ANGER AND STUPIDITY THAT IS BECOMING MORE RAMPANT IN THE US. YAY FOR YOU.

8. carlea on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 01:27:PM said...

that is the most expensive box I've ever seen. that room is small, even for NY. I can't imagine that they think this is a good deal. So what if they'll pay it off in a few years, what is the resale value...my guess is there won't be any takers. store clothes at the drycleaners? that is not living, that is slumming it. very strange!

9. Anonymous on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 02:19:PM said...

I live in Japan currently due to the USMC and can tell you even though it is overly crowded by people the small spaces for living and narrow roads do nothing but add to the already claustrophobic atmosphere. Why should we change the states to be like another country? Why should we be a follower rather than the leader we always have been? I think there has to be another option. These are not homes but small boxes, large families need large space and as long as Americans continue to purchase large scale items like all American businesses encourage us to there will be no room for them in smaller living spaces, won't that just hurt our economy more? People won't be able to buy like they are now if they have no where to put anything.

10. obamawave on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 06:33:PM said...

Get Ready for the Obama Wave of the Future...100 Square Feet for 200 grand...and your taxes will be through the roof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

11. ajackson7738 on Thursday, Jan 14th at 10:43:AM said...

What the heck does Obama have to do with someones choice to spend $150,000 on a house. Thank God I live in Texas. 2200 square feet, swimming pool and all for less than $150,000. Obama had nothing to do with my purchase.

12. JerseyGrl on Thursday, Jan 14th at 12:28:PM said...

Wow...it's pretty sad when a somewhat inane story like this causes republican propaganda. What the heck does Obama have to do with two people deciding that they want to live in a box. NY is extremely crowded and property values are exorbitant--BEFORE Obama, btw. Perhaps this is just two people making a decision that works for them. Or maybe, just maybe it is evidence of the leftover economic hardship from George W. Hmmmm....

13. Anonymous on Saturday, Dec 19th at 11:03:AM said...

Wow, that is insane! I just purchased a 4 bedroom 2.5 bath, 2500 sqft home for 150,00. If they have the ability to pay off a mortgage that size in just two years they must be making very good salaries so why would you choose to live like that?? You're not saving yourself any money by eating out every single meal or storing your clothes at the dry cleaners. Why not live outside Manhattan in Brooklyn and just commute...at least you wouldn't have to live in a walk-in closet. Which by the way the closet in my master bedroom is larger than their apartment!

14. NEW YORKER on Monday, Jan 18th at 04:57:PM said...

You need to be a New Yorker to understand. If you go outside the city it will take you from 4-6 hours to commute and parking from 1,000+.month; not to mention insurance and gas, last you 3-4 years in Yes Yes public transportation if there is and really will you like to smell like a dump by the time you get to work? FYI in NYC RealState sells and purchase by square inches not sq ft... This has been going on for decades . What would you get to live in a huge home when you will never enjoy it, live in it.Pay 4 to 5 times at the end of 30 yrs. To the new homeowner.CONGRATS ! at least you have a place you call home and is pay off, and do not have a Mrtg for Now you can use your money to travel ENJOY life.At the end what would you take with you ?.....NOTHING just your MEMORIES. LIVE LIFE
Ahh before you judge me; Yes I am A NYC native who lives in Fairfax, Virgina , my house is pay off...To be honest yearn to go back , but cannot afford to live there :((
As for our Mr. President...hum This Country is going down with little brains who want to be popular and do not think about human lives...... Hey NOW THINK BEFORE WE VOTE NET TIME ! ! !

15. DW on Tuesday, Feb 2nd at 10:38:AM said...

Very well said!

16. pat on Monday, Jan 18th at 04:56:PM said...

Apparently some of you are not familiar with what housing costs are in Manhattan. $150,000 is by no means extraordinary (by NYC real estate values) for the space listed. In Tokyo the same floor space would go for millions. Yikes!!!

17. mary ann larssen on Monday, Jan 18th at 04:56:PM said...

Obviously some of the posters have never been to or tried to find an apartment in NYC.....

18. Jenny on Thursday, Dec 24th at 04:06:PM said...

Wow, I left NY for open spaces and I could never go back.

19. vicky collins on Thursday, Dec 24th at 07:57:PM said...

What? Talk about stir crazy! That is insane, how can you be happy and healthy living in a box?

20. grazillda on Tuesday, May 25th at 07:23:PM said...

It really depends on your expectations. Think of the economic and ecological strain of people heating and air conditioning huge houses where they may only use 10% of the rooms on a regular basis.
Some of my favorite memories were spending summers traveling and living in an old VW van with my the three kids. Crowded? I prefer to think of it as cozy. And the housework takes almost no time at all!

44 Comments / 3 Pages

 

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog post. First-time comment? Enter your name and e-mail address, and you'll receive an email confirming your comment and issuing you a password. Your name will be displayed with your comment, but your email address will not. To create additional comments, use that same password. Comments may contain up to three live links; line breaks and paragraphs will automatically be converted to HTML.

Poll

Rob Hahn asked, now you get to answer: What is your attitude towards owning a home vs. renting longterm?
Owning a home is still a great way to invest for the long term - it's still at the center of the American Dream9126 (66.2%)
Ownership can be overrated. It's better to rent long term than extend yourself financially just for the sake of owning a home.4659 (33.8%)

Most Popular Stories

Follow Us

Local Homes for Sale