5

COMMENTS

PRINT

TEXT SIZE:

A A A
When Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Wall Street mortgage-backed securities machine all went the way of King Kong and Godzilla last year, that left just one home finance giant standing: the Government National Mortgage Association, or Ginnie Mae. Ginnie Mae bundles together mortgages into securities, and backs their sale to investors.

Ginnie Mae survived by sheer luck. It only guarantees mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration, and during the subprime craze FHA became irrelevant, backing barely 3 percent of all mortgages. But with subprime's demise, FHA lending has surged, insuring more than one-third of all new home loans. And suddenly Ginnie, an understaffed bureaucracy, has become an essential source of financing for home loans.

A new investigation from The Center for Public Integrity and Washington Post reveals the sorry result: Ginnie has funneled an estimated $100 billion to dozens of mortgage lenders with records of reckless and sometimes illegal business practices.

One of them, Lend America of Long Island, New York, is being charged by borrowers and regulators with failing to pay off old mortgages when it sold new ones, forcing borrowers to pay both mortgages or face foreclosure. Lend America, which also had a top executive with a mortgage fraud conviction on his record, received $1 billion in financing via Ginnie Mae. Other Ginnie Mae-backed lenders have excessively high foreclosure rates, often a sign that a lender made a loan it shouldn't have.

Reckless and fraudulent lending by companies approved to do business with FHA watch has been a problem for a while now – it's been a year since Business Week dubbed FHA "The New Subprime" – that has sent the agency's insurance reserves, financed with a fee on every mortgage, to dangerous lows. But as the Center for Public Integrity points out, Ginnie should have been a second line of defense against bad lenders. Instead, it waited for FHA to act – Ginnie cut off Lend America just last week, after FHA suspended it.
Add Your Comment

Tags: FHA, Ginnie Mae, GinnieMae, subprime mortgages, SubprimeMortgages

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

1. Dennis on Tuesday, Dec 15th at 05:33:AM said...

Are you strapped for cash well then come on over an check out our web sites its total free
click on any of the links an check them out . www.internethomebusiness4you.com an or www.justlivinmydream.com what do you have to lose but some of your time? but you might gain something!

2. John Rebchook on Saturday, Dec 19th at 03:57:PM said...

FHA loans are growing in popularity in Denver and Colorado.
http://insiderealestatenews.com/2009/12/fha-loans-soar-in-denver-colorado/

3. Robert young on Sunday, Feb 14th at 02:38:AM said...

Fannie Mae,Freddie Mac,Ginnie Mae, Should have to PAY back Tax payer's from dasterdly dealings that turned the WORLD upside DOWN.DAME EMM!

4. Tae Chang on Wednesday, Mar 3rd at 12:59:AM said...

Check out the following website for lenders in your area that are making "bad loans".

https://entp.hud.gov/sfnw/public/

5. refresh on Thursday, Apr 15th at 09:38:AM said...



the Government has no need to have problems dealing with house foreclosures because the Government already has functioning working systems programmes concerning affordable housing for masses in all states in America. So, the Governmert should bailout itself by recircling all these foreclosed houses into the Government already exiting subsidized housing system programmes, and then resource the astaked equity which could have gone to support the morgages into the government's account. Meaning, the government still gets that subtle equity from the bankers though. And this equity into the government account will now create jobs by employing workers with it to distribute these newly claimed foreclosed houses in to the already existing subsidized housing in the states. Then, this means more houses in the already functioning government subsidized housing in the states. So, there wont be more long line of waiting in these already exiting functioning subsidized housing in the states. And if the government is giving out subsidized houses to the masses of the states, then the masses have no need for morgages how much more for bailout. Because all these bailedout snags are only justifiable if the masses are equally benefiting from it at the same time. Heath care bailedout benefits everybody and so it is justifiable. Another would -be justifiable bailout should be on education, because children and people from parents, grand parents, adopted and foreigners masses need education for skills, innovation, invention, to be self reliant, create more jobs, and have the knowledge to contribute more positively to the nation. Consider this people.

5 Comments / 1 Pages

 

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog post. First-time comment? Enter your name and e-mail address, and you'll receive an email confirming your comment and issuing you a password. Your name will be displayed with your comment, but your email address will not. To create additional comments, use that same password. Comments may contain up to three live links; line breaks and paragraphs will automatically be converted to HTML.

Poll

Rob Hahn asked, now you get to answer: What is your attitude towards owning a home vs. renting longterm?
Owning a home is still a great way to invest for the long term - it's still at the center of the American Dream9126 (66.2%)
Ownership can be overrated. It's better to rent long term than extend yourself financially just for the sake of owning a home.4659 (33.8%)

Most Popular Stories

Follow Us

Local Homes for Sale