1045

COMMENTS

PRINT

TEXT SIZE:

A A A

"I have no clue where I'll be," come Friday, says Greg Staffa in a phone interview with HousingWatch. The Farmington, Minn. man claims that is when he will be thrown out of his modest townhouse into the bitter Minnesota cold at week's end -- and all because he is overweight. Oh, let's just skip the political correctness here. Because he's "fat."

Staffa's troubles began, he says, when he was injured on the job as a baggage handler for Northwest Airlines back in 2006. At the time, the now 34-year old Staffa weighed in at 275 pounds. He stands 5'9, he says.

A doctor hired by Northwest wrote a report blaming Staffa's injuries on his extra weight. That, says Staffa, led to a cascading series of events that left him unemployed and unable to pay the mortgage on his home since October 2008.

The townhouse cost him $155,000 and he had a 30-year fixed rate mortgage, he says.

"That report changed everything," Staffa tells HousingWatch, referring to the doc who called him fat. Had it not been for that report, he says he'd either still be working with his seniority intact, or he would be out on workman's comp. Either way, he would have the money to make his monthly mortgage payments, and wouldn't be in this dire situation, he says.

It wouldn't be the first time Staffa found himself without a home. For a period in 2001, he lived out of his car, and later undertook a road trip trip/publicity tour to call attention to the plight of homeless people.

Now, Staffa is using his situation -- and his flair for PR -- to take on what he sees as the widespread view that people in foreclosure are "deadbeats." His website, www.becauseimfat.com, chronicles his weight and shelter woes, and goes to lengths to demonstrate his own sense of personal responsibility. Staffa, who wears a patriotic shirt in the photo on his site, wants you to know that he's not had a credit card since 2000; that he bought a less expensive house than he qualified for; and that he's never been on welfare or food stamps. "We forget that each foreclosure is a story," he writes.

I asked Staffa repeatedly if he really thought he was losing his home because he is fat. He hesitated before answering, and then went into a long explanation on how his being called fat by the doctor eventually led him to where he is at today: screwed!

If Staffa really believes that he is about to lose the roof over his head because of the fat hanging over his belt, then his current weight is not likely to help any. He has ballooned, he says, from 275 pounds back in 2006 to 290 pounds now.

Do you think Mr. Staffa's argument carries any weight?

Charles Feldman is a journalist, media consultant and the co-author of the book, "No Time To Think- The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle". He also is a regular contributor to WalletPop

Add Your Comment

Tags: deadbeat, fat, foreclosure, unemployed

Reader Comments (Page 4 of 53)

61. Claude DeMoss on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 06:28:AM said...

Whose fault is it that the man is fat, the lenders?
cdm
San Jose, CA

62. Louise M. on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 10:14:AM said...

You say,"Whose fault is it that he is fat?" That shows a complete lack of comprehension(intelligence) on your part. He is not complaining that he is overweight. He didn't have a problem with his own weight. He is upset that he is being discriminated for it. Apparently he did his job without a problem for many years. Don't you think thin people get hurt on the job? My cousin and my brother in-law are always out of work with ailments and they're both THIN.

63. kim on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 06:29:AM said...

we should care

64. jd on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 07:05:AM said...

Sounds to me the guy is trying to find an excuse for his lazyness. If he was more in shape maybe he wouldnt of been injured on the job. Or it wouldnt of been as bad as it would be if he wasnt overweight. There are tons of people out there going through forclosure and this is the first guy I have heard of that is blameing it on his weight. Give me a break. Blame yourself not someone thinking your fat.

65. kimberly on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 08:07:AM said...

you are right...we should ALL care...too much of this happens to too many people...we ALL need to care...could be one of us one day...

66. nickL on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 08:47:AM said...

Pior to his injuries, he was permitted to work with the companies full knowledge of his physical condition. If he was a danger to himself or others due to a unhidened condition, the company also to blame. Their were no physical requirements (yearly physicals) at the time. Sue under unfair labor practices. A lawyer may take the case without money up front.

67. Sandy on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 09:27:AM said...

Yes I agree with you. We should care. I believe Creg.I lost my job b'cos of medical condition in May 2008 and have not been able to find work up until today. I was denied unemployment till end of 2008 b'cos of a very inconsiderate statement from my job. Cregg fight for it. I had to.

68. Miss M on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 06:28:AM said...

I don't know if a connects to b...........But, he IS creative and should have been a Litagation Attorney!!!

69. JoAnn on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 11:32:AM said...

but he can not spell or make use of the rules of grammer. so that rules that out.

70. Sammi on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 06:30:AM said...

Yes I do.........companies pay Doctor's big bucks to keep well deserving individuals from receiving Workers Compensation.A program designed to help the injured worker, has become a nightmare to navigate and in the end, the injured worker is the one who suffers.My father was injured and over the course of the years, he lost a leg. At the age of 66 the Bureau of Workers Compensation in my state wanted to "rehabilitate him" so he could go back to work. From his wheelchair, during the interview, he calmly stated "go right ahead" Of course, the redfaced worker was acutely aware, that she had not been given correct communication about his physical status, apologized and left. Our systems and programs are very flawed. I hope this man gets his life back.

71. kay on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 07:42:AM said...

Really, companies actually pay doctors to reject worker's comp pay? Can you list them?

72. Doug on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 08:30:AM said...

This is 100% rue Workers comp does pay doctors and other companies to say you are ok to work. I am going through it right now. Workers comp company. Companion Property and Casualty. AND ITS LEAGAL.

73. bgs on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 08:40:AM said...

I know of no companies who "pay" doctors big bucks to write up false claims and I know of no doctors who would do such a thing and risk losing their license. As a matter of fact, I own a company and the doctors do not write up false reports on injuries in order for me to fire someone. I say we don't know ALL the facts of this story. It sounds like a heartbreaker, from his view, but we haven't heard the side of the employee or the mortgage company. Who knows what he did to be injured or the circumstances surrounding that injury. Maybe he was laid off instead of actually fired. Maybe he started missing a lot of work because of his "injury" so they let him go. I have had employees that said they got injured then started missing more and more work. And I know that these same employees would be mad if I let them go. I don't know how they think I can run a company with someone missing work all the time and putting more and more work on their co-workers. I say we don't know all the facts so reserve judgment.

74. Doug on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 08:50:AM said...

I was in a car crash back in January. I got a broken back out of the deal. I can still hardly walk, can’t even put my shoes on, and can't stand for more that just a few minutes. The workers comp Dr sent me for an FCE to determine what I can and can’t do. Even with a description from my job, (and the fact that she watched TV the whole time I was there) she said I was fine. I can’t put my shoes on without help but I'm fine? This is legal for them to do. She didn’t even describe me in the FCE. This is a sworn statement.

75. Lynda on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 06:47:AM said...

I don't believe his argument. I used to work with Mr. Staffa as a baggage handler at Northwest Airlines. I still work for Northwest Airlines. We have plenty of people who are "fat", they all seem to still have their jobs, and yes, some of them were also injured on the job.

76. Dstar on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 07:14:AM said...

So that proves his point....why would the dr. rule that he should not receive workers comp.?

77. Lee on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 08:52:AM said...

Thank You. Finally someone that knows a little about this man. This man is after someone to support his butt. It's people like him that make the system really hard on people that need it. Toss him out and be done with it. Worthless User.

78. AMD on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 09:15:AM said...

TO: bgs
First, let me explain that an (employee) is the worker not the company he or she works for. Secondly, the employer (that is the company) does not pay the dr directly. The employer carries insurace by law for the Worker Compensation. The doctors are hired by the insurance carrier that covers the employer. The doctors job is to protect the insurance company to the best of his or her ability, from paying out costly to the injured employee. So if you can understand, they will play down the injury so much as to discourage any payments at all.
Also, if an employee has a job related injury that debilitates his ability to work how are you complaining that he is not showing up for work? Would you like him to further injure himself and incur more liability your way? Use your head.

79. Celeste on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 06:37:AM said...

I believe Greg is a victim of discrimination. Overweight people are considered to be "less than" those that are not overweight. I am sorry that he is losing his home because of it.

80. Andrew on Wednesday, Dec 16th at 08:27:AM said...

Right... He'll sue the airline for no reason for the fact that since 2006 he's been unemployed he couldn't find a job for 3 years?? and more importantly he's bee unemployed and homeless before this is a pattern

1045 Comments / 53 Pages

 

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog post. First-time comment? Enter your name and e-mail address, and you'll receive an email confirming your comment and issuing you a password. Your name will be displayed with your comment, but your email address will not. To create additional comments, use that same password. Comments may contain up to three live links; line breaks and paragraphs will automatically be converted to HTML.

Poll

Rob Hahn asked, now you get to answer: What is your attitude towards owning a home vs. renting longterm?
Owning a home is still a great way to invest for the long term - it's still at the center of the American Dream9126 (66.2%)
Ownership can be overrated. It's better to rent long term than extend yourself financially just for the sake of owning a home.4659 (33.8%)

Most Popular Stories

Follow Us

Local Homes for Sale