131

COMMENTS

PRINT

TEXT SIZE:

A A A
abandoned houseWhat's a city supposed to do when foreclosures tally into the thousands and streets are glutted with far more empty, falling-apart houses than people willing to live in them?

For a growing number of cities, a big part of the answer is: knock 'em down.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has awarded $2 billion in grants in the second phase of its Neighborhood Stabilization Program, in which local governments and nonprofits had to compete to prove they had the worthiest plans for foreclosure recovery. But stabilization can take many forms, as the plans make clear.

In some areas, where plenty of people still need places to live and just can't afford it, the grants are being used to help families with modest incomes buy foreclosed homes cheaply. If you live in California – specifically L.A., Long Beach, Modesto or Orange or Alameda counties – and want to buy a foreclosed home, this could be a great opportunity. Same in Miami and some other parts of Florida where affordable housing is perpetually in short supply.

But in many cities, such as Chicago, Tucson, Milwaukee, Denver, Philadelphia and all across Ohio, the situation is dramatically different. Ohio, in particular, has a glut of deteriorating foreclosed homes and little demand. And that requires a different strategy.

Cuyahoga County, home to Cleveland, will be using its $40 million grant to fix up and resell 216 foreclosed or abandoned homes – and tear almost a thousand down. (About a hundred of those will be "deconstructed" so that their building materials can be reused elsewhere.) The city of Springfield will build 35 new homes, fix up and sell 33 foreclosures... and tear down 150 others. Dayton plans to tear down more than 1,600 empty houses. Hamilton County, where Cincinnati is located, is slated to demolish 84 more, Toledo 272, and Columbus 100 more.

Add another 360 tear-downs that Ohio promises to handle, and it adds up to 3,561 homes to be bulldozed on the federal dime. Only Michigan, whose grant will bankroll 2,500 demolitions, comes close.

Why all the wreckage? Simple math provides part of the answer. Ohio's cities have been losing population for years. Cleveland, for instance, has seen its population drop by half since 1960. Many urban homes and neighborhoods suffered further because they became ensnared in mortgage fraud schemes, in which conspirators bought and resold decrepit real estate to one another at insanely inflated prices in order to take out big mortgages and pocket the money. It was literally a shell game, and for years – well before the mortgage crisis hit the rest of the country – Ohio's cities ended up with empty houses, sometimes entire streets of them. In the worst-hit neighborhoods, mortgage servicers have been selling rickety houses once fraudulently appraised at $100,000 or more for less than $5,000, no questions asked, just to be rid of the headache.

Bad as that might sound, the scary thing is that the number of houses slated for demolition is dwarfed by the actual number that are standing there rotting, usually without any lender taking responsibility for the blight. Roughly one in ten homes in the city of Cleveland – more than 20,000 in all – are now vacant.
Add Your Comment

Tags: cincinnati, Cleveland, demolition, Foreclosures, HUD, Neighborhood Stabilization Program, OH, ohio, Ohio real estate, Springfield

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)

1. glen on Sunday, Feb 14th at 07:23:AM said...

We should line up all the companies that were able to fake all the documents needed to put people in a house they cant afford. Especially the ones who dont have a drivers liscense needed to buy a house, but its required to sell one? Here in phoenix I would like to know what finance company was able to do just that? Those are the people that should be in jail! They caused this mess and nobody is accountable for their actions? WAKE UP AMERICANS

2. Chris on Sunday, Feb 14th at 07:48:AM said...

Exactly, Why don't the government put the homeless in these abandoned house instead of wasting money tearing them down. non- profits and charities could help then fight addiction, provide food and then these people could be put on a payrol cleaning up the rust belt.

3. Joe. on Sunday, Feb 14th at 08:59:AM said...

Chris Dodd,Barney Frank.Jamie Gurellicand also Barack Obama set policy for this to happen.they oughtto be sitting next to Bernie Maddoff

4. Joe on Sunday, Feb 14th at 09:12:AM said...

I never knew that if you couldnt drive a car you were not supposed to own a home!

5. shawn on Thursday, Mar 4th at 08:01:AM said...

More hand out .Thats all this is Take 5 from one person and give it to someone that does't want to work for it .

6. George on Sunday, Feb 14th at 10:31:AM said...

You can thank our illustrious "pollytishuns" in D.C. for loans to people who could not afford it. "DO THEY WANT IT? Give them the loan with no questions asked!" That farce applied mostly to illegal immigrants and welfare people. NOW the legal taxpayers can pay for it. Notice I did not specify "WHICH" 'pollytishuns' caused this. Most are guilty to some extent.

7. jersey grandma on Sunday, Feb 14th at 10:38:AM said...

I AGREE THE ONE'S IN CHARGE OF THE MONEY SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR LENDING THE MONEY OUT. THE BANKS SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE ALSO FOR SELLING LOANS ON THE MARKET. THE BANK THAT LOANS OUT THE MONEY SHOULD HAVE TO HOLD THE NOTE UNTIL IT IS PAYED OFF,NOT SELL IT OFF LIKE THAT. WHO ALLOWED THAT MOVE ANYWAY.

8. Bonnie on Sunday, Feb 14th at 11:02:AM said...

I agree that the people that gave these loans should be held accountable. They were responsible for the ruined lives and dreams of many people. I believe the homes use should be based on the needs of the Town or City's location and the Loaners should now be Mgrs. of the properties.

9. CJ on Sunday, Feb 14th at 12:08:PM said...

I bought my home 5 years ago. At the time, the mortgage broker was trying to tell me I was approved for a house that the mortgage payment would be $1290 per month, not including escrow! I'm a single mom with 3 kids and my income was not quite double that per month at the time. I decided to go elsewhere because I knew I wouldn't have enough money to live on if I went through with it. He kept trying to pressure me though. After I did buy my house, I had to refinance 2 years later or my interest rate was going to go up to 14%! I refinanced with my same lender over the phone because they made it easier. They tried to get me to borrow more money than what I wanted. This guy is trying to tell me I can borrow 170,000 on a house I purchased for 117,000. Now I'm not an appraiser or anything, but my common sense told me my house is NOT worth that much! I want to upgrade in a few more years, and if I had listened to that man, I would be stuck here forever, or forclosed! They need to be in jail for fraud!

10. Lou on Sunday, Feb 14th at 11:19:AM said...

I'm all for that Glen. But that would also mean putting Clinton, Frank, and Dodd in jail too. They were the one's responsible for easing the financial and credit requirements for buying a home, as well as putting pressure on Fannie and Freddie to buy up all those sub-prime mortgages. Personally, I would have no problem seeing them in jail too.

11. Mike on Sunday, Feb 14th at 11:45:AM said...

I agree with you Glen...they need jail time for the shell game!!

12. hank on Sunday, Feb 14th at 01:42:PM said...

You mean Congress don't you!! They forced banks to give loans to folks that couldn't afford them. And to compound on Congresses bad results from their "feel good" program, Adjustable Rate Mortgages just amplified the potential of unpayable loans.

13. Edwin Young on Monday, Feb 15th at 10:40:PM said...

Attention: I'm interested on what is going on with the Banks when the home
owners are being forced into a lower value on their homes and the taxes stay the same. This tells me that the banks are not holding u to their values and the home owners are taking the bite out of their pockets. I wait your reply.

Sincerely,

Edwin K. Young

14. KATHY on Sunday, Feb 14th at 07:49:AM said...

My mother, a resident of Cleveland, kept her home pristine. She wasn't dead 3 weeks before the hoodlums tore down her home to shreds. They tore the aluminum siding off, ripped out the plumbing, and tore the porch off the home. The neighborhood had been forced to accept Section 8 people, who were basically living off the government and destroying the neighborhoods. We lost her old, but beautiful home to the animals living in our cities. No one is tackling some of the real problems. There are no longer people with values and principles in our main cities. Some of the older residents who had built up the community, didn't have money, but made sure homes were kept up and painted and repaired. It really didn't matter - because the elements allowed to move into those neighborhoods on the government's nickle, single-handedly trashed those neighborhoods. Actually, if homes were left for a very short time after a senior's death, it was destroyed for the copper that could be had. So the scams started. There were shady real estate people who were quickly selling homes to phantom buyers, but there was no intention of occupancy. I don't know how this was all done - but I know in Cleveland, property was simply destroyed by the people that the government moved into those neighborhoods.

15. Mark on Sunday, Feb 14th at 08:40:AM said...

Kathy. You're SO right. Cleveland, and some, if not all, of the first ring suburbs are shot. Section 8 scum has ruined the entire area. Nowhere is escapable from the trash that is like a cancer to neighborhoods. It's a shame too, because I'll bet your Mother's house was well kept and pristine, as you put it. I have no idea why the lenders weren't brought up on charges of some kind for writing fraudulent loans, unless there were simply too many of them and they were too hard to track. Someone needs to be held accountable for this mess.

16. chris on Sunday, Feb 14th at 11:19:AM said...

Kathy,how right you are.Take Slavic Village for an example.What once was a proud community has been devastated. Not only do they wait till people die to destroy houses,they actually steal the aluminum siding,etc while the people are living in the house.It makes me sick because I know the section 8's are coming to the foreclosed houses in the burbs

17. Kenny on Sunday, Feb 14th at 09:32:AM said...

@KATHY,an amazing, incredible and sadly true story!
i would love to see an expose or some sort of documententary to record these events.

18. Kingbtd on Sunday, Feb 14th at 09:44:AM said...

The only animals I know of are the bankers that feed on your enlightened world view.

19. steve on Sunday, Feb 14th at 09:46:AM said...

Lawyers equal greed and corruption and low morals. You can bet that these outfits that sold these homes to people who couldn't afford them got plenty of legal advice from their lawyers. Oh, and aren't most of our politicians lawyers? Seems like a vicious circle of greed and corruption from professional people who are "basically honest." (Definition of "basically honest: They won't lie, cheat or steal unless they have to.") And who pays for it in the end? WE DO. BTW - these advertisements in these comment sections are pathetic. I wonder if those submitting them are part of that "work at home from your computer" crowd. Well, that's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.

20. Steve Glabecki on Sunday, Feb 14th at 09:50:AM said...


Well said. Living in Slavic Village, I see this blight every day of my life. sec 8 people don't have a sense of possion and don't care.All they do is sell drugs drink wine, smoke dope. get rid of section 8 and make they people desemate another area.

131 Comments / 7 Pages

 

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog post. First-time comment? Enter your name and e-mail address, and you'll receive an email confirming your comment and issuing you a password. Your name will be displayed with your comment, but your email address will not. To create additional comments, use that same password. Comments may contain up to three live links; line breaks and paragraphs will automatically be converted to HTML.

Poll

Rob Hahn asked, now you get to answer: What is your attitude towards owning a home vs. renting longterm?

Most Popular Stories

Follow Us

Local Homes for Sale