65

COMMENTS

PRINT

TEXT SIZE:

A A A
lawn in Southern Calif.Southern California residents have not one, but two thousand more reasons to rip out their water-wasting turf: a check in the mail.

The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) and a handful of other utility companies are paying SoCal residents to rip out their suburban lawns. In exchange, homeowners are required to replace grass with drought-tolerant, native plant species or install permeable surfaces which filter water back into the ground. Common permeable surface choices include flagstone, brick, and gravel. The rebate is $1 per square foot, up to a maximum of 2,000 feet.

The process works like this:
The homeowner notifies the utility company of changes made to their lawn. The utility company comes to verify changes have been made and then issues the check. Specific enrollment details can be found on the Socal Water$mart Web site.

Cyberhomes blogger Marcie Geffner writes:
The rebate might not be enough to persuade homeowners who really love their lawns. But for me, the offer was a no-brainer as I wanted to replace my big boring lawns with flagstone walkways, cactus and other plants that are more natural to the climate, if not necessarily native.

Other water-saving rebates available through LADWP include incentives to replace toilets and clothes washers with high-efficiency models, timer controlled irrigation, and pressure-reduced sprinkler nozzles. If you're willing, there is even a rebate for installing synthetic turf.

Check with your local utility company or DSIRE.org to see what environmentally-conscious rebates are available in your area.
Add Your Comment

Tags: cash, conservation, DSIRE, grass, landscaping, plants, rebate, SoCal, southern california, water

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)

1. Mic on Sunday, Feb 21st at 06:58:AM said...

WOW, Look how STUPID the Two above Spammer E-mails are.....You can find them ALL over the Boards on every site. I wish them and the telemarketers would just friggin realize that NOONE is going to buy their products when they use the same jam it down your throat advertising as Dumdocrats use.

2. JR on Sunday, Feb 21st at 08:25:AM said...

Redumblicans are stupider

3. mark on Sunday, Feb 21st at 09:40:AM said...

The word's are no one not noone.

4. ycav4424 on Sunday, Feb 21st at 07:07:AM said...

How do you people with the virus ridden spam always get to be the first in almost every comment section?

5. ernest on Sunday, Feb 21st at 07:19:AM said...

WHEN ARE YOU PEOPLE GONNA REALIZE, THE CRAP THAT california has been trying on it's residents has harm the whole country? get off this stuff!

6. mark turner on Sunday, Feb 21st at 08:14:AM said...

It's like Washington this past yr...either use force or taxpayer $$$ to get your way!

7. Tom on Monday, Feb 22nd at 10:05:AM said...

Residential lawn and commercial lanscape irrigation are the two biggest wastes of water we have. Automatic sprinklers on timers only exacerbate the situation.
If people and companies were required to move hoses and sprinklers around by hand, a lot less water would be used.

How many times have you seen the sprinklers at a commercial property operating during a rain storm? How much water have you seen running down the street because of poorly-designed, poorly maintained irrigation systems?

I'm a ground-water consultant in Central Texas. If it were up to me, ALL lawn and landscape irrigation would be banned. If the grass/plants can't survive under natural conditions, they shouldn't be there.
The importation and planting of foreign species that require pampering is just moronic.
There should be no financial reward for NOT irrigating. There should be punishment FOR irrigating. (Vegetable gardens are exempt.)

My area of the country got out of a severe 2-year drought with rains that started last October. People's wells went dry, pumps burned up, and the lakes were drawn down to near-record low levels.
But, even with supposed water rationing by cities, lawn and landscape irrigation ran rampant.

The same people who complained about not being able to go boating and skiing on the lakes were watering the hell out of the their lawns.
They seem to be unable to put 1 and 1 together.

There are many areas in the US where water usage exceeds nature's ability to replentish it with rainfall.
America needs to wise up before it is too late.

The global water crisis is far more critical than the supposed global warming.

Take heed. You will die of thirst or lack-of-water diseases long before you drown from melting ice caps.

8. Patti Fletcher on Sunday, Feb 21st at 07:31:AM said...

I tho't CA was broke...how can Ahnold afford this? I know...I know...spend to save in the future...but you have to have something to spend first. I guess that's why I'm not on the US of A financial wizard...I'd be a bust. I'd just keep saying, "No," like I have to tell myself all the time every time I want the latest expensive gewgaw doodad.

9. makeda on Sunday, Feb 28th at 01:59:AM said...

This is not the dumb---- governor,it is the stupid mayor and the DWP.

10. JF on Sunday, Feb 21st at 11:25:AM said...

If you would bother to READ the article, you'd see that this was NOT the state of CALIFORNIA doing this, it was a utility.

Just another knee-jerk fro m another jerk.

11. Rosemary on Sunday, Feb 21st at 07:51:AM said...

This is a great idea! People have no idea how much lawns cost..not just in water, but the chemicals used to keep them green, the fuel used to power mowers, etc. I think it's very exciting. I've been slowly eliminating my lawn for the past 6 years. Expanding some ground covers and replacing with moss in some areas. I wish them well.

12. KatieCouric'sNemesis on Monday, Feb 22nd at 10:07:AM said...

Have you any idea how much maintenance and chemicals a grassless lawn needs/use/cost????

Years ago, when I lived in the desert, lawns were verboten by the local water agency. So, the front and back yards were sand or landscape gravel. The minute a grass or weed sprouts, you've got to hula hoe it out and spray to kill the parts of the root you can't get to, otherwise your yard looks far worse than a lawn that needs mowing.

13. jerry inc on Sunday, Feb 21st at 08:02:AM said...

What about the guy that has a landscape company and depends on those lawns. Great idea lets put some more people out of work!!

14. mark turner on Sunday, Feb 21st at 08:15:AM said...

Then they'll just hafta move back to Mexico.

15. rar43 on Sunday, Feb 21st at 08:29:AM said...

Excellent point...some will make money for the removal and replacment..in long run the landscaper makes less money monthly

16. Akuin on Monday, Feb 22nd at 10:06:AM said...

Actually the landscape guys will be fine, other then public parks (Which use grass so the kids don't kill each other. Our landscapers maintain nicely designed desert plants, they always have. It'll be fine for them, they might lose a little business -but- at the same time they might earn more landscaping the lawns to new native flora.

17. snoel on Monday, Feb 22nd at 10:07:AM said...

Landscaping should include more then mowing lawns-like cliping plants, maintaining mulch and weeding...otherwise its just a mowing service.Unless one is raising grass eating animals(that will mow it), there is no practical reason for a lawn and its pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers. A small area of grass can be maintained by hand....think out of the box!

18. John S on Sunday, Feb 21st at 08:14:AM said...

How about all the plants and flowers along the freeways that cost a fortune to maintain, and obstruct the view of traffic getting on the freeway. The sprinkler systems that seem to be running all the time to keep all that green.

19. poot on Sunday, Feb 21st at 01:35:PM said...

Iceplant somehow obstructs your view? What the hell are you talking about?

20. balugablue21 on Sunday, Feb 21st at 08:21:AM said...

california just build the dam salination plants

65 Comments / 4 Pages

 

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog post. First-time comment? Enter your name and e-mail address, and you'll receive an email confirming your comment and issuing you a password. Your name will be displayed with your comment, but your email address will not. To create additional comments, use that same password. Comments may contain up to three live links; line breaks and paragraphs will automatically be converted to HTML.

Poll

Rob Hahn asked, now you get to answer: What is your attitude towards owning a home vs. renting longterm?

Most Popular Stories

Follow Us

Local Homes for Sale