4

COMMENTS

PRINT

TEXT SIZE:

A A A
You know how when you were a kid, and you maybe did something you shouldn't have done? But you had to go back to school the next day, so you really hoped and wished and prayed that somehow, magically, you would be rendered invisible to your fellow classmates when you walked into the room? That you wouldn't be noticed? That you could just get through the day without calling attention to yourself?

Now, suppose you were the new Manhattan headquarters for Goldman Sachs: the same Goldman Sachs that is in the crosshairs of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Manhattan federal prosecutors, and just about every investigative reporter trying to write a book about how the planet was plunged into a two-year economic convulsion by Goldman's, shall we say, "complex" financial dealings. (The firm allegedly bet against its own clients in order to rake in more money than anyone could reasonably dream of.)

As you might imagine, if you were that building, the Goldman Sachs building, you might want to be invisible. So how do you go about being an invisible 42-story skyscraper?

As the New Yorker magazine tells it, apparently it's easier than you might think.

"At 200 West Street, as the building is known, the name of the firm appears nowhere on the exterior, or in the lobby, or even on the uniforms of the security personnel or the badges given to visitors," writes the magazine.

The first employees actually started working back in November at the new $2.1 billion building -- which according to the Wall Street Journal features such amenities as "a gym with overachiever fitness classes like 'Awesome Abs.' " But it wasn't til recently that anyone noticed that the building doesn't appear to have any name on its outside or inside!

A few months back, the U.S. architecture critic for Bloomberg, James S. Russell, wrote this of it: "As I contemplated this edifice at 200 West Street, a block from Ground Zero, some numbers came to mind: The $1.65 billion in tax-exempt bonds that helped build the tower and saved the firm $100 million. The $115 million of tax breaks Goldman wrung from city and state officials desperate to show progress at the World Trade Center site...."

Gee. With all that money being tossed around, you'd think Goldman Sachs would at least want its freaking name on the building!

Maybe they can write it on huge, white cards in invisible ink.

Charles Feldman is a journalist, media consultant and co-author of the book "No Time To Think -- The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle." He has written about real estate-related issues for several years.
Add Your Comment

Tags: goldman sachs building, Goldman Sachs fraud, goldman sachs headquarters

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

1. student on Monday, May 10th at 11:51:AM said...

Unlike other firms, Goldman has always been discrete, never too flashy. Look at the old building or the ones in London, they don't have any markings at all.

2. fireumall on Monday, May 10th at 04:03:PM said...

Wow. Another financial flop. They are all screwing clients, which ultimately ends up screwing these firms and banks themselves EVERY TIME! There is a pattern here guys! Years of investing, and being responsible with clients money is what made these companies so successful for so long. Also, able homeowners who supply all the information requested by banks, make "trial payments" on time, make extra payments each month to get caught up on past due mortgages, have to deal with banks and lenders lying, even while they are recording themselves, losing important financial documents and paperwork with clients financial information with no trace of any of it what so ever, losing mortgage payments sent in by homeowners, even refusing to speak to clients in which they have a lending agreement with, only to foreclose anyway?. Real genius thinking they will not get caught. They are losing everything including any respect from anyone in this country. Home owners investments are gone, and it looks like the insurance money banks hope to reap from these foreclosures is used up now. Way to run yourselves into the ground guys! Are you done yet?

3. Alby Hornswaggled on Tuesday, May 11th at 09:24:AM said...

Look into who, was on the receiving end of the largest political contributions from this Co. and what party the people at the top of Goldman Sachs belong to.

4. egdio on Tuesday, May 11th at 10:52:AM said...

watch the other hand, their still in bed with the white house. research their connection to the cap and trade scam.

4 Comments / 1 Pages

 

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog post. First-time comment? Enter your name and e-mail address, and you'll receive an email confirming your comment and issuing you a password. Your name will be displayed with your comment, but your email address will not. To create additional comments, use that same password. Comments may contain up to three live links; line breaks and paragraphs will automatically be converted to HTML.

Poll

Rob Hahn asked, now you get to answer: What is your attitude towards owning a home vs. renting longterm?
Owning a home is still a great way to invest for the long term - it's still at the center of the American Dream9126 (66.2%)
Ownership can be overrated. It's better to rent long term than extend yourself financially just for the sake of owning a home.4659 (33.8%)

Most Popular Stories

Follow Us

Local Homes for Sale