49

COMMENTS

PRINT

TEXT SIZE:

A A A
Filing for bankruptcy to avoid foreclosureIt's sad but true. Americans are increasingly filing for bankruptcy in order to avoid foreclosure.

Katherine Porter, a bankruptcy expert at Harvard Law School, estimates that 75 percent of Chapter 13 filings fall into this category. "Despite all the government programs, bankruptcy is probably the most commonly used foreclosure prevention technique," Porter tells HousingWatch.

If you'd like to file for bankruptcy but are worried about your credit, Porter says don't worry. "Those who have a foreclosure filing against them, their credit score has already taken such a big hit that the additional blemish of bankruptcy is not particularly significant," she says.

It's sad that we've had to resort to this, but the truth is that bankruptcy filing stops the foreclosure process cold. Lenders aren't even allowed to try collecting debts until a judge gives them the OK.

It's only a short reprieve though, says Porter, lasting a couple of months at the most because by then most court cases have been resolved.

So how do you go about this delicate maneuver?

The first step is filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. You could also file for Chapter 7, but that doesn't really work very well, as CNN Money points out. Borrowers usually lose their homes in a Chapter 7, because the home becomes an asset that can be used to pay off other debtors.

Porter recommends sticking to Chapter 13 filings because a court will look at all your finances -- incomes, bills and disposable income -- and set a three to five year repayment plan that determines how much you must pay each month to make up your arrears. Someone with good income might be all caught up by the end of five years, but most people end up just paying off a fraction of their debt.

Don't do it if you're not sure this will work, however. Legal fees for Chapter 7 will cost you more than $1,500; for Chapter 13 it's around $3,000.

Beware: Filing for bankruptcy doesn't work for everyone. Says Porter: "Chapter 13 works poorly for people whose mortgage is totally unaffordable." It only makes sense if you have a job, and enough income to pay your mortgage and other bills. Otherwise you could find yourself unable to keep up with the court-mandated payment plan, which would put you in the same tight spot again a year from now. At that point, you won't be able to file for bankruptcy because there are legal limits on how often you're allowed to do it.

In other words, bankruptcy will give you a leg up in catching up with your payments; and it won't let you make the same mistakes all over again.


More on AOL Real Estate:
Find out how to calculate mortgage payments.
Find homes for sale in your area.
Find foreclosures in your area.
Get property tax help from our experts.


************************************************

Want to learn more about home buying and home finance? If so, you won't want to miss
our online discussion with industry experts,
"What Works Now: Smart Moves When Buying a Home,"
created by AOL Real Estate in participation with Bank of America Home Loans.
Watch it now on AOL Real Estate.
Add Your Comment

Tags: Bankruptcy, Delinquent Borrower, foreclosure prevention, Foreclosures, personal bankruptcy

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)

1. Trey on Sunday, Jul 25th at 08:29:AM said...

If America held people more responsible for their debt rather than business electives to remove it, the situation may be different. Too many people use this as an escape clause.

2. renair on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 09:00:AM said...

Spoken like a true banker that caused this mes to begin with.

3. 94deffe7 on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 09:59:AM said...

No Trey, no one wants to find electives or escape from paying their debts like you are blabbering about. People have lost their jobs and going through a crisis, maybe you are one of the lucky ones who have scammed more people than Madoff, and don't know what it is like to be a struggling homeowner. No one wants this, so shut your mouth, we don't want to hear your sarcstic remarks.

4. amjams on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 12:37:PM said...

It's funny how people are quick to judge. The cost of living increases, and the income of the families decreases (or, at least, no raises what-so-ever). Property taxes increase, the cost of insurance increases, utilities, transportation, etc...all increase--and you're supposed to continue to pay all of these things on the same dime you made five-to-ten years ago. Not possible. Also, you have to consider that emergencies come into play (cancer diagnosis, dibilitating illness or injury), and you no longer have that "cushion" since bills went up and you're being paid the same you were ten years ago. Ten years ago you had money to put into savings. Now, you don't. Add in disability (bringing home 60% of your income) or unemployment, your income is even less while your bills increase greatly (copayments, medications, etc., on top of the already-increased utilities, mortgage, etc.).

For many people, bankruptcy is the ONLY option for them to keep their home and/or car. I will admit, there are abusers, but, when given the circmstances, it might be necessary. It's not like tons of people are trying to rack up all these bills and then declare bankruptcy--there are guidelines and criteria that must be met before it can be filed and/or approved (research those before judging). Most people are afraid to declare bankruptcy, too--it's not an easy decision because it can screw tons of things up down the road...

5. Rhanna Lynn on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 01:22:PM said...

Trey I agree with you. Although most of the postings do not. I agree that there are some circumstances where unforeseeable situations cause a person to fall behind in their bills, those are the exception, and not the rule. So, to the remark about cancer, everyone whose home is in forclosure has cancer? SO, 100% of forclosures are due to loss of job or illness? It never occured to anyone that it may be due to just plain stupidity and that they couldn't afford what they purchased to begin with? My husband took a paycut that amounted to half of his income. Although things are tight, it is still a doable situation. HOwever, when building our home we did it within our means, and not with the idea that he would earn X amount of dollars more within a few years. Also, we didn't buy a house, 2 new cars, a pool, and house full of furniture, run up our credit cards to the limit, then figure we could make it ONLY if he continued to earn X amount of dollars. We did plan for the what if's. So, to those who didn't plan for the what if's ( and their homes are in forclosure) I'd say that you couldn't keep up with the Joneses and you couldn't afford it to begin with. Why the banks would agree to lend someone more then they could afford to repay is another matter. However, it should be the responsibility of the borrower, first, to know if what they are wanting to lend is within their budget. The banks are not baby sitters to the hoards of wanna be's in this world. And, if you lose it, so what, tough break. You should have been wiser and more realistic with your finacial situation to begin with.

6. amjams on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 01:58:PM said...

Actually, Rhanna Lynn, the reason foreclosures have gone up is because of the increasing loss of jobs. It seems that job-loss has finally leveled out, but not before many people lost their homes. Not everybody who filed bankruptcy is trying to keep up with the Joneses, either--very normal people who live in average homes with fifteen year old furniture (no pool, no new car) are filing bankruptcy as well. This can be due to job loss, pay reduction, illness, divorce, etc. And, yes, I would tend to believe that the increase of forclosures and filing bankruptcy would have to do with most people losing jobs, having decreased income, or illness versus "keeping up with the Joneses". I didn't say ALL (100%? Never stated that in my post), I said MANY.

I DO agree that there is some irresponsibility in the fact that banks loaned money to people who couldn't afford it. However, there are people out there who did plan for the "what ifs", but didn't cover them all--or maybe they did plan in that situation, but didn't plan for five "what ifs" at one time. Your spouse loses his/her job, child winds up in the hospital for a solid month, the only car you have needs to be replaced because the motor blew, the furnace needs to be fixed...even with careful maintenance, these things can still happen.

Hey, it happens...it can happen to you...it has happened to people that never thought it could happen to them. I believe it can happen to me, no matter how much I try to avoid it (two years salary in the bank--and then some!).

7. deni on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 02:19:PM said...

unfortunately when someone loses their job, they most likely lose health benefits and when you lose that and get sick, you are up the creek without a paddle. you either sign your house over to government so you can be on medicaid or you declare bankruptcy... which is the lesser of 2 evils?!? when you need very expensive medications and treatments... you do what you have to.

8. Rhanna Lynn on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 04:40:PM said...

This is in response to the posting #7 by amjams:
I DO acknowledge that there are circumstanses beyond someone's control and that debt can mount quickly. However, MANY of the problems are of people's OWN makings. The what if's can happen to anyone myself included. BUT, one must be responsible for themselves and take steps to insure that if the road becomes bumpy there are some cushions along the way. IF this is unrealistic then a reevauleation of fiances is the only option. There are MANY people whom live from pay check to pay check ( myself NOT included) and every cent is spent long before it's ever earned. One little problem and the wheels basically come off. Why should there be any sympathy or help for them? If you can't afford a lifestyle unless a ten hour, seven day a week job is needed then I think your living on the edge, and you can't afford it. I am talking about people with jobs and not people with extenuating circumstances of illness/death etc. There is a diffrence. I have sympathy for them and NOT for the wanna be's who can't afford to take a little paycut because they are, up to the bumper, in debt.

9. Manny on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 05:44:PM said...

Filing bankruptcy has become abused by irresponsible loser young adults that have way overextended themselves by spending foolishly on crap and luxuries they didn't need. Now they file bankruptcy to get their debts forgiven only so they can spend other peoples money again in the future. People that file bankrupysy should have all their possessions including their homes stripped away from them.

10. Faith Pezzini on Thursday, Jul 29th at 07:48:AM said...

Yes, some people ARE looking for loopholes. (Although I do agree there are a lot who are legitimately struggling.) I had a customer claim for over a year that she couldn't even afford to make a $10 monthly payment and that she didn't believe a judge would give us a judgement against her because the economy was so bad, so she just wasn't going to pay us anything...even though she still had her job, etc. Needless to say, we got the judgement & she made payment arrangements in front of the judge for more than $50 a month - more than 5 times the amount that we'd been asking her to make which she said she couldn't afford. She was just looking for a way out of the debt & we called her bluff.

11. ttrexxx on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 08:00:AM said...

If your house is not worth what you owe because of the market chapter 7 is best.house is not a positive value

12. Tony on Sunday, Aug 22nd at 03:13:PM said...

File Chapter 7 then convert to 13. If home is owned jointly have only one person file. If you get into trouble you can dimiss that case and have the other spouse start the process over again. There is only a 6 month waiying period for Chapte 13. You can always convert to a Chapter 7 at anytime. Try going DIY pro-se. You can finance filing fees.

13. ttrexxx on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 08:03:AM said...

trey you just got cancer and can not work...now go pay your bill's a hole...You have been cursed for your comments..have a nice short life

14. robert ratliff on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 08:22:AM said...

I BOUGHT A HOUSE AND 3 YEARS LATER I TOOK OUT A SECOND MORTGAGE WHICH WAS A 10 YEAR LOAN. LATER I WAS FORCED INTO BANKRUPTCY BUT I CONTINUED PAYING ON THE HOUSE, NO PROBLEM, BUT WHEN THE 10 YEAR LOAN WAS DUE I RECEIVED A BALLOON PAYMENT NOTICE. I COULD NOT PAY IT AND THE HOUSE WENT INTO REPOSSESSION. THE BANK THAT HAD THE 10 YEAR LOAN LOST OUT ON THE SALE OF THE HOUSE. THE GREEDY BANK GOT NOTHING. THE HOUSE IS CURRENTLY UP FOR SALE.

15. Mike on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 08:33:AM said...

I am sorry for your plight but how is the bank GREEDY? They loaned you money, you failed to repay it. Yes, they lost out in the end but you walked away with that seocond mortgage money in your pocket, or most likely already spent on something else. That money was never repaid. Who is the greedy one here? You basically stole that money from the bank.

16. Joel on Wednesday, Jul 28th at 05:21:PM said...

I am 100% with you Mike.

17. Gary on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 08:41:AM said...

There are situations where the person is FORCED to do something. For example, if a home was purchased together by a married couple, only one person is on the mortgage, and the spouse abandons the marraige, then the one holding the mortgage cannot afford it alone. This happens everyday. Yes, there are people that take advantage os the system, but there are also people that have paid there bills on time for their entire lives and end up in a situation that they did not create. Bankruptcy is provided for by our founding fathers. Don;t be so quick to judge, you may find yourself in an unexpected bad situation one day and be forced to do something you never expected to.

18. robert ratliff on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 08:46:AM said...

COMMENT TO MIKE. I PAID ON THE 10 YEAR MORTGAGE LOAN AND WHEN THE 10 YEARS WAS UP THE GREEDY BANK WANTED A BALLOON PAYMENT THAT I COULD NOT POSSIBLY MEET. I TRIED TO REASON WITH THEM BUT THEY WERE TOO ANXIOUS TO FORCE FORECLOSURE. EVERY YEAR THE PAYMENTS GOT LARGER AND LARGER AND FINALLY I HAD TO LET THE HOUSE GO. THE 2ND MORTGAGE LOAN WAS TO PAY FOR AND ADDITION I PUT ON THE HOUSE, SO THEREFORE I DID NOT "KEEP THE MONEY IN MY POCKET. IF THE 2ND MORTGAGE BANK WOULD CONTINUE ACCEPTING MY PAYMENTS I WOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO GO INTO FORECLOSURE.

19. bruce williams on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 11:54:AM said...

Robert,
Sounds like you were gambling that with the money you received from the second mortgage, you could build an addition that would increase the value of your home, and long before the balloon was due, you would have a property worth enough to either sell it, and pay off both the conventional fixed rate 30 year loan and repay the second (including the balloon at the end) and walk away with enough profit to possibly buy/finance an even nicer home. The bank gambled that you would meet your monthly payments including the balloon, a common end to a 10-year second, but they held an ace in the hole. If you payed 9 years and 11 months on time and then balked at paying the balloon, they had the right to force forclosure and they won the gamble. To complain you could have continued to make the monthly payments if they had just been reasonable, changed "the game" If they had done that, then it wouldn't have been a 10 year mortgage gamble on the money you accepted for the addition. It's called real estate speculation. There can sometimes be a big winner and there can sometimes be a big loser. I have lost money on real estate and I have gained some, but I never blamed the lender if my speculation resulted in my loss.

20. r on Tuesday, Jul 27th at 12:24:PM said...

in short you were living beyond your means and your terrible with money, you got the short sighted attitude of "i wanna have fun" A bank is an intitution, greedy is a human emotion, a non humam intstitution can not have the human emotion of greed. you lost your house because your a human and you were greedy buying something you could not afford. I live within my means no matter how small my means are

49 Comments / 3 Pages

 

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog post. First-time comment? Enter your name and e-mail address, and you'll receive an email confirming your comment and issuing you a password. Your name will be displayed with your comment, but your email address will not. To create additional comments, use that same password. Comments may contain up to three live links; line breaks and paragraphs will automatically be converted to HTML.

Poll

Rob Hahn asked, now you get to answer: What is your attitude towards owning a home vs. renting longterm?
Owning a home is still a great way to invest for the long term - it's still at the center of the American Dream9126 (66.2%)
Ownership can be overrated. It's better to rent long term than extend yourself financially just for the sake of owning a home.4659 (33.8%)

Most Popular Stories

Follow Us

Local Homes for Sale