1
COMMENTS
Goldman Sachs Didn't Profit From Mortgage Defaults, But It Tried
Apr 8th 2010 @ 2:40PM
We're good guys, really! Goldman Sachs, the publicly vilified former investment bank famously nicknamed a "great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity" by Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi for the way its seemingly wraps its tentacles around every far flung money-making opportunity, issued a defense in its annual letter to shareholders this week. The company did not benefit by wagering that the mortgages behind the securities it originally issued and sold would default, it said. Goldman's chief operating officer Gary Cohn wrote in the letter: "The firm did not generate enormous net revenues or profits by betting against residential mortgage-related products, as some have speculated."
So, fine, Goldman didn't reap huge profits off bets against securities built upon the plummeting prospects of underwater homeowners. But that's not to say that it didn't try.

In his latest effort to stop
With
Watching the CEOs of America's largest banks testifying this week to Congress about their roles in starting The Great Recession with varying levels of contrition and defiance raises the question: exactly who are banks really accountable to in these post-TARP days?
The recession is over, we're told by Bernanke, Geithner, and Summers, it's time for an exit strategy, to wind down the economic stimulus before it turns inflationary. Big banks are booming, TARP funds are coming home to roost, the market's up, the Fed has stopped buying mortgaged-backed securities, and the first-time home buyer tax credit will end in a few months. 






