Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. Learn about the characteristics, types, and reporting guidelines of systematic reviews, and how they differ from narrative reviews and meta-analyses.
A comprehensive and updated list of notable databases and search engines for finding and accessing academic articles, books, datasets, and other resources. Compare the coverage, retrieval qualities, access costs, and providers of different services across disciplines and domains.
Google Scholar is a free web search engine that indexes various formats and disciplines of academic publications, such as journals, books, theses, and patents. It also provides features for citation analysis, author profiles, and related articles.
PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items to help authors report systematic reviews and meta-analyses of health care interventions. It covers the title, abstract, methods, results, discussion and funding of a review, and provides a flow diagram to show the selection process of studies.
PICO process is a mnemonic used to frame and answer a clinical or health care related question, using four components: patient, problem or population, intervention, and outcome. It is also used to develop literature search strategies for systematic reviews and other research designs.
A literature review is an overview of the previously published works on a topic, often used in academic research. Learn about the different types of literature reviews, such as narrative, systematic, and meta-analysis, and how to conduct them using artificial intelligence or other methods.
A review article summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic within a certain discipline, based on previously published studies. It can be categorized as narrative, systematic or meta-analysis, and follows a specific structure of scope, aim, sources, abstract and discussion.
However, “This systematic review of multiple studies showed that mobile phone use likely does not increase the risk of brain cancer, including gliomas, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas,” she ...