Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The issue arises because nothing prevents someone from inserting “bogus” material, and the lack of control seems to doom Wikipedia as a credible source [11]. Essentially, “Wikipedia lacks scholarly backbone in the form of subject experts and a referee process” [12]. People can lie and have lied about their credentials.
Reliable scholarship – Material such as an article, book, monograph, or research paper that has been vetted by the scholarly community is regarded as reliable, where the material has been published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses.
Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the ...
CRAAP test. The CRAAP test is a test to check the objective reliability of information sources across academic disciplines. CRAAP is an acronym for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. [1] Due to a vast number of sources existing online, it can be difficult to tell whether these sources are trustworthy to use as tools for ...
Academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources. Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and news coverage ( not opinions) from mainstream newspapers . Self-published media, where the author and publisher are the same, are usually not ...
The argument from authority is a logical fallacy [2] (also known as ad verecundiam fallacy ), and obtaining knowledge in this way is fallible. [3] [4] However, in particular circumstances, it is sound to use as a practical although fallible way of obtaining information that can be considered generally likely to be correct if the authority is a ...
See also. References. Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources. WP:PUS. Wikipedia's requirement for writing articles is " verifiability, not truth ". We rely on what is written in external sources to write this encyclopedia, yet not all sources are equal. The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and ...
If the identity of the author can be confirmed in a reliable, published source, then it can be used with the caution appropriate to a self-published source. Facebook : Facebook is generally not acceptable as a reliable source, as anyone may create a page and add comments, and there is no stringent checking of a user's real name and age.